Legal Opinion

Holsey v. Armour & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 20, 1984No. 83-1428PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge:

Armour & Company appeals from a judgment of the district court entered upon findings that the company had discriminated against black persons in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

Armour’s 20 assignments of error encompass virtually every provision of the court’s judgment, which afforded both individual and class relief.

This case is before us for the second time, and we now decide:

1) The district court complied with our mandate on remand.

2) The district court did not err in allowing certain class…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. TM Trucking of the Carolinas, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  2. Elizabeth M. Paroline v. Unisys Corporation Edgar L. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. Marva BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COACH STORES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. James B. BRISTOW, Appellee, v. the DAILY PRESS, INC., Appellant. James B. BRISTOW, Appellant, v. the DAILY PRESS, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Cones, Kenneth L. v. Shalala, Donna E.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API