Legal Opinion

Worden v. Van Gieson

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 15, 1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Petition for the probate of will. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

This is a proceeding for the probate of an instrument purporting to be the last will and testament of the above-named decedent, propounded by Gilbert Van Gieson and Ellen Jane Van Gieson, who are named as executors in the said instrument. The probate is opposed by Martha Worden and *238Mary Yansice, daughters of the decedent, on the ground that said alleged will was not executed according to law.

The alleged will is dated May 5th, 1875, and appears to be signed at the end by the decedent by mark, in this wise:

her

Witness to mark, Ellen + Yan Gieson.

Y. M. Smith. mark

There follows a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of CottrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Brown v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Peck v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  4. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of SimpsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Sullivan's WillMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. In re Hyland's WillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API