Moore v. Gore
Tennessee Supreme Court
1DissentTomlinson, Justice
For tlie reasons now to be stated, and because of the importance of the majority decision, I feel compelled to dissent from the conclusion reached.
Plaintiff’s declaration alleged defendant Mitchell to be the owner of the automobile involved in this accident, and that it was being operated at the time with his knowledge and consent and on his business and that the proximate cause of the accident was its negligent operation at this time. These allegations clearly stated a cause of action against Mitchell.
Mitchell was a nonresident of Tennessee. The plaintiff was a resident of Davidson County.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crockett v. McLanahanTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Carroll v. MatthewsTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Achy v. HollandTennessee Supreme Court · 1881
- Chickasaw Wood Products Co. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Klepper v. PowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1871