Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Polaris Investment Management Corp. v. Abascal

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided November 18, 1994No. 04-94-00684-CVPublished

1ConcurrenceRickhoff, Justice

Although the result is contrary to my sense of justice, current law and Texas Supreme Court guidelines on venue and mandamus constrain us to deny leave to file the relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. Under our rules of procedure we may not grant leave to file or even maintain the status quo with temporary relief unless we are “of the tentative opinion that relator is entitled to the relief sought.” Tex.R.App.P. 121(c).1 Present mandamus guidelines prevent us from granting the relief. I write to alert the Texas Supreme Court to the danger of not modifying the mandamus and venue rules2—…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Ruiz v. Conoco, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Wilson v. Texas Parks & Wildlife DepartmentTexas Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API