Legal Opinion

Barton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1906No. 3329Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSOjST, Presiding Judge.

Motion was made to quash the indictment because of its vagueness and indefiniteness, and because it is nowhere alleged that the house known as Bolla Bagley’s house, where Dock Bagley had been living, was not a private residence. The perjury is alleged to have been committed before a justice of the peace, wherein said justice was inquiring as to whether appellant had, “at a house known as Bolla Bagley’s, where Dock Bagley had been living, in the city of Lampasas, on the night of October 30, 1905, seen Clay Huling, H. S. Stanley and Alf Bonner, or any one or more of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API