Fries v. Null
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 1, Oct. T., 1892, by defendants, Francis M. Nall and Heater Null, from judgment of C. P. Westmoreland Co., Aug. T., 1886, No. 124, on verdict for plaintiff, Jesse Fries. Reargument; sci. fa. sur judgment in ejectment. The facts appear in 154 Pa. 573.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Green,
We have given a patient and careful attention to the very able argument of the learned counsel for the appellee in this ease, with an entire willingness to correct any error we may have committed in our former opinion. But after a re-examination of the opinion, and in the light of the reasoning and authorities submitted on behalf of the appellee, we find ourselves unable to change the view we then expressed. In the case of Burke v. Allen, 3 Yeates, 351, the facts were so entirely different from those of the present case, and the parties and their positions, with…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burke ex rel. Harrison v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1802
3Cited by6 opinions
- English v. RossDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1905
- Southwestern National Bank v. RiegnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Ridings at Brandywine Associates, L.P. v. Citizens Bank (In Re Bella Vista Associates, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- Gillespie v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Southwestern National Bank v. Riegner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.