Legal Opinion

KENT WILLIAMS v. KARL BAUMGARTNER, DR. CAMPBELL, KRINA STEWART, MALARY LOGAN, CLINICIAN ARNOLD, WARDEN RICHARDSON, CAPTAIN CROWEL, LIEUTENANT STERNER, LIEUTENANT TAMEZ, and DIRECTOR TEWALT

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided February 23, 2026No. 1:24-cv-00279Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO KENT WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:24-cv-00279-DCN Plaintiff, SUCCESSIVE REVIEW ORDER v. BY SCREENING JUDGE KARL BAUMGARTNER, DR. CAMPBELL, KRINA STEWART, MALARY LOGAN, CLINICIAN ARNOLD, WARDEN RICHARDSON, CAPTAIN CROWEL, LIEUTENANT STERNER, LIEUTENANT TAMEZ, and DIRECTOR TEWALT, Defendants. Plaintiff Kent Williams has filed an Amended Complaint in this action (Dkt. 24), which the Court reviews under the standards of

28 U.S.C. § 1915

and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2). The Court has the authority to seek additional information from the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API