St. Lawrence County National Bank v. Watkins
New York Supreme Court
Demurrer to' complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtWhitmyer, J.
The action is on a promissory note. The complaint alleges: “ that on or about the 29th day of January, 1910, the defendants Frank H. Watkins and Mary F. Watkins, for a valuable consideration, duly made, executed and delivered to the defendant Bertrand H. Snell their written promise to pay to said Bertrand H. Snell the sum of $3,-500, with interest at five per cent, per annum one year after its said date.” The complaint does not state that the note was made payable “ to order ” or “ to bearer ” and contains no further statement of the consideration. Defendant Mary F. Watkins has demurred on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Greeff v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Carnwright v. . GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Frank v. MandelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Fulton v. VarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Deyo v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Owens v. BlackburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- St. Lawrence County National Bank v. WatkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912