Legal Opinion

St. Lawrence County National Bank v. Watkins

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Demurrer to' complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitmyer, J.

The action is on a promissory note. The complaint alleges: “ that on or about the 29th day of January, 1910, the defendants Frank H. Watkins and Mary F. Watkins, for a valuable consideration, duly made, executed and delivered to the defendant Bertrand H. Snell their written promise to pay to said Bertrand H. Snell the sum of $3,-500, with interest at five per cent, per annum one year after its said date.” The complaint does not state that the note was made payable “ to order ” or “ to bearer ” and contains no further statement of the consideration. Defendant Mary F. Watkins has demurred on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Greeff v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Carnwright v. . GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Frank v. MandelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Fulton v. VarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Deyo v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owens v. BlackburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. St. Lawrence County National Bank v. WatkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API