Legal Opinion

Keller v. Roetting

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Circuit Court, Cabell County. ■ Action by George W. Keller against F. C. Roetting, Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Lynch, Judge:

By this action, trespass on the case, Keller seeks to recover, as damages, the difference between the actual cost price of certain drug store stock of goods and fixtures, including a soda fountain, and the cost thereof as represented by Roetting at the time of the purchase. In substance, it is an action for deceit, based upon false and fraudulent representations of the actual cost price of the fixtures and supplies. The deal was for the capital stock of the corporation, and not in the specific fixtures or drug supplies.

After averring in detail the cost represented as paid and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Broyles v. BeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hervey v. CrouchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API