Legal Opinion

Muhler v. Hedekin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1889No. 14,238PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Allen Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J. —

The plaintiffs, Hedeliin, Kunkle and Meyer, instituted this proceeding against the common council of the city of Fort Wayne to enjoin the latter from investigating or hearing certain accusations made against the plaintiffs as trustees of the city water-works, and from removing them from their respective offices upon certain charges alleged to have been lodged with the common council against them. It is alleged in the complaint that controversies between the common council and the plaintiffs, as trustees, concerning the conduct of the water-works, had resulted in the preferring…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Donahue v. County of WillIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Poyer v. Village of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Sheridan v. ColvinIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. State ex rel. Gill v. Common Council of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Angelus v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. Landes v. WallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Morgan v. NunnU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1898
  4. Shoemaker v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Taylor v. KerchevalU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API