Legal Opinion

In re Davis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 5, 1897No. 10853PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Original proceedings in habeas corpus. At the last session of the Legislature, the following concurrent resolution was passed by both houses as senate concurrent resolution number 26 ; "Whereas, Certain charges of bribery and the use of improper influence having been made from time to time for the purpose of influencing the members of the House of Representatives and Senators, to vote for or against certain measures, bills and resolutions pending in the Legislature for…

Read the full summary

Original proceedings in habeas corpus. At the last session of the Legislature, the following concurrent resolution was passed by both houses as senate concurrent resolution number 26 ; "Whereas, Certain charges of bribery and the use of improper influence having been made from time to time for the purpose of influencing the members of the House of Representatives and Senators, to vote for or against certain measures, bills and resolutions pending in the Legislature for passage at the present session ; and “Whereas, Charges of this nature have been made by reputable citizens of the State of…

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

l'mlttfetodVoTel.jmn-nmentof Legislature. Two principal questions are presented for determination. The first is, whether the committee appointed under Senate concurrent resolution No. 26 has authority to act after the adjournment of the Legislature ; the second is, whether it has power to imprison a witness for refusal to testify. The general rule undoubtedly is that the powers of committees of legislative bodies cease on the final adjournment of the body, unless express provision is made for their continuance ; but that the houses of the Legislature have power to confer authority on a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. In re SimsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  5. Ex Parte McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Fergus v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Leek v. TheisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Taylor v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. State ex rel. Godard v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  5. State Ex Rel. Jones v. AtterburySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API