Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Birnbaum v. Trussell

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 28, 1966No. 87, Docket 30300Published

1ConcurrenceHays, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result.

It cannot strictly be said that Dr. Birnbaum's complaint claims that he was *680denied a hearing. It appears that he declined to attend a hearing unless he was furnished with a copy of the charges against him. In view of the fact that the charges had received a wide airing and had been the subject of discussion between Dr. Birnbaum and various of his superiors, it is difficult to believe that Dr. Birnbaum was seriously prejudiced by the refusal to provide him with a copy. He could have attended the scheduled hearing and, if any of the charges or of the testimony against him…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Wieman v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Torcaso v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Keyishian v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API