Legal Opinion
Davis v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 13, 2003No. 03-3172PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Curtis Davis, an Ohio prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order dismissing his complaint for injunctive relief. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
On October 25, 2002, Davis filed a “Complaint for Injunctive Relief’ that sought an order preventing the warden at the Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) in Elk-ton, Ohio, and the institution staff from depriving Davis and other inmates of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Darryl McGore v. Gene L. Wrigglesworth, Chief Sheriff Richard Chinelli, Administrator Ingham County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Lee Hampton v. Ron HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Joseph D. Little, D/B/A Little Marina v. Clayton Yeutter, Secretary, U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service F. Dale RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
3Cited by51 opinions
- Airmont v. Adult Parole AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
- Ali v. MartinoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Allah v. Genisys Credit UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Arrington v. Advanced Health CareDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Calhoun v. WashingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.