Legal Opinion

Morris v. Imperial Cap Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1904No. Docket No. 50Published

Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer, J. Bill by Edmund A. Morris against the Imperial Cap Company, Limited, James McKnight, Adolphus Fixel, and others, tc enjoin the payment of certain claims against defendant company. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The Imperial Cap Company, Limited, was, prior to February 10, 1902, engaged in manufacturing. The complainant was a stockholder. The defendant James McKnight was also a stockholder and chairman.. The company, having met with a fire loss, determined on the date named to go into liquidation. Thereupon three liquidating trustees were appointed under the statute (2 Comp. Laws, § 6087). The liquidating trustees procured an order from the circuit court of Wayne *477county authorizing them to manufacture the stock on hand, and to hire the necessary employés for that purpose. Defendant James McKnight was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Higgins v. LansinghIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. St. Louis, Fort Scott & Wichita Railroad v. ChenaultSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. Inglehart v. . Thousand Island Hotel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Appeal of HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API