Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Jaquiss

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided July 27, 2001No. GD 98-5519Published

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, J.,

Defendant Jaquiss asserts nine instances of error in her motion for post-trial relief:

*185“(1) The trial court erred in ruling that the Dead Man’s Act had been waived.
“(2) The trial court erred in limiting the cross-examination of plaintiff’s expert, Marvin I. Matz M.D., when defendant was precluded from cross-examining the expert on a standard work in the field.
“(3) Dr. Matz was permitted to offer opinion testimony which fell beyond the scope of his stated area of expertise.
“(4) The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for partial nonsuit on plaintiff’s claims for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chase v. GroffDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API