Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1982No. Nos. 44181, 44182PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Defendants Sears, Roebuck and Co., and J.C. Penney Co. appeal from judgments against them for actual and punitive damages in a false imprisonment case tried before a jury.

Plaintiff’s petition sought judgment against Sears, Penney and a Sears employee, O’Rando, for false imprisonment and assault and battery. The assault and battery claim was submitted only as to O’Ran-do. The jury returned a verdict in favor of O’Rando on both the assault and battery *32and false imprisonment submissions and against Sears and Penney on the false imprisonment submissions against them.

In May…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stokes v. Wabash Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  2. Bergel v. KassebaumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Salsberry v. Archibald Plbg. & Heat. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. JesseeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Nelson v. R. H. MacY & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rustici v. WeidemeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Blue v. Harrah's North Kansas City, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Rankin v. Venator Group Retail, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Signorino v. National Super Markets, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Burtrum v. U-Haul Co. of Southern MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API