Legal Opinion

Fuentes v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 12, 2017No. 64/16Published

1Opinion of the Court

Miguel A. Fuentes v. State of Maryland, No. 64, September Term, 2016. Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL LAW — CONDITION OR STATUS OF THE VICTIM: Court of Appeals held that evidence of a medical diagnosis is not required to establish a victim’s status as a “mentally defective individual” as defined by Md. Code Ann., Criminal Law (2002, 2012 Repl. Vol.) (“Crim. Law”) § 3-301(b). The plain language of the statute does not support a determination that a medical diagnosis is required to prove the status of the victim. Further, the statutes at hand, Crim. Law §§ 3-301(b), 3-304(a)(2), and 3-307(a)(2),…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. State v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API