Legal Opinion
Ihrke v. Northern States Power Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 8, 1971No. 3-70-Civ-100PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
In this action for declaratory and injunctive relief under the Civil Rights *405Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, defendant moves to dismiss on the grounds that the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter and that the complaint, as amended, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Inasmuch as this is a motion to dismiss, the court must look to the plaintiffs’ “well-pleaded facts as the hypothesis for decision.” Collins v. Hardyman, 341 U.S. 651, 71 S.Ct. 937, 95 L.Ed. 1253 (1951).
The amended complaint alleges that plaintiffs Ihrke have been…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Clarence Eisen v. Oliver C. EastmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Collins v. HardymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robert J. Ihrke and Mary E. Ihrke v. Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Stanford v. Gas Service CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1972
- Danner v. Louiseville Gas & Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1974
- Robert J. Ihrke and Mary E. Ihrke v. Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972