Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Estate of Eckart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1975Published

1Dissent

Latham and Shapiro, JJ. (dissenting).

We find that by her will the testatrix intended to and did disinherit her children, the petitioners, except for the nominal legacies of $50 each. These nominal legacies, in our view, tend to support the testatrix’s intent to disinherit them. Thus, the decision in Matter of Cairo (35 AD2d 76, affd 29 NY2d 527), on facts almost identical to those in this case, is controlling and must *68be followed. The notices of election should therefore have been declared invalid.

The legislative trend has been to reduce restrictions on charitable bequests, apparently because…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CairoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. In re the Estate of CairoNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
  4. In re Estate of NorcrossNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API