Legal Opinion

Dunbar Tire & Rubber Co. v. Crissey

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

• Error to Circuit Court, Kanawha County. Action by -the Dunbar Tire & Rubber Company against R. W. Crissey and another. To review judgment for plaintiff notwithstanding a verdict for defendants, the defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Ritz, Judge:

This writ of error brings np for review a-judgment of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County rendered in favor of the plaintiff, notwithstanding the verdict of the jury in favor of the defendants. The suit is an action of assumpsit brought to recover the sum of fifteen hundred dollars which it is claimed the two defendants received out of the treasury of the plaintiff without any authority, or without any consideration; they being at the time the president and the treasurer of the plaintiff respectively.

The facts are that the plaintiff was organized as a corporation in September,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maupin v. Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Holt v. Otis Elevator Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Ruffner Bros. v. Dutchess InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. McMillan v. Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Anderson v. Tug River Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Koblegard Co. v. MaxwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Gray v. N. & W. Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Bowlby-Harman Lumber Co. v. Commodore Services, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Clise v. PruntyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Zogg v. Kern Oil & Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API