Legal Opinion

Marchese v. Metheny

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1922No. Civil No. 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. J. E. Jones, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtFlanigan, J.

Metheny, appellee, the owner of a Hnpmobile automobile, left it at Orr & Miller Company’s repair-shop and garage in Phoenix, Arizona, ■ for the purpose of haying a new set of gears put in *334it. A few- days. afterwards, and on April 3, 1919, Orr & Miller Company declared the job finished, bnt Metheny refused to accept delivery of the car until he was satisfied of the fact. A test run being accordingly agreed upon, Mr. Miller of the company drove the car about the streets of Phoenix, Metheny sitting in the front seat with him, while a mechanic from the garage stood on the running-board to listen…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berry v. Borough of Sugar NotchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Davis v. BoggsArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. ConwellArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Navajo-Apache Bank & Trust Co. v. WillisArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Twohy Bros. v. KeponArizona Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Channel v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. Herndon v. HigdonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API