Legal Opinion

Harris v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 18, 1939Published

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action to recover damages for breach of rental contract.

There is evidence on the record permitting the inference that in December, 1937, defendant's intestate, Marcellus Smith, agreed to rent to the plaintiff for the ensuing year "four acres in tobacco, four acres in cotton and six acres in corn"; that it is the general custom "when the landlord furnishes the team, each gets one-half of the crop"; that plaintiff cleaned up the vacant house which he was to occupy on defendant's place, but was prevented from moving in because there had been "some backing out." Plaintiff worked elsewhere…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Machine Co. v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Spencer v. . HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. Herring v. Armwood.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  4. Perry v. . KimeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Gulley v. . RaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API