Legal Opinion

Tira Shelby v. United States of America

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 15, 2026No. 1:25-cv-13064Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TIRA SHELBY, Plaintiff, Case No. 25-cv-13064 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Tira Shelby (“Shelby”) sues the United States of America (the “United States”) bringing claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). The United States now moves to dismiss, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, claiming Shelby’s action is barred under the doctrine established in Feres v. United States.

340 U.S. 135

(1950). For the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Apex Digital, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Cathleen Silha v. ACT, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Gregory Maas, Frank Felinski, Richard Sciaraffa, and Gregory Binnebose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API