Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Barrett

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 23, 2006No. 2004-232-AppealPublished

1Opinion of the Court

894 A.2d 891 (2006)

Jane Sylvia BARRETT

v.

Mark H. BARRETT, alias, et al.

No. 2004-232-Appeal.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

March 23, 2006.

Mark A. Sjoberg, Esq., Warwick, for Plaintiff.

Nicholas Gorham, Esq., North Scituate, for Defendant.

Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., GOLDBERG, FLAHERTY, SUTTELL, and ROBINSON, JJ.

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG, for the Court.

Was the illusory transfer test set forth by this Court in Pezza v. Pezza, 690 A.2d 345 (R.I.1997), legislatively repealed by the enactment of G.L.1956 § 33-25-2(b), as enacted by P.L.1999, ch. 444, § 1?[1] The plaintiff, Jane Sylvia Barrett (Jane or…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bourg v. Bristol Boat Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  2. Mariorenzi v. Joseph DiPonte, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
  3. Webster v. PerrottaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  4. United Lending Corp. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  5. In Re Advisory to the GovernorSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API