Legal Opinion

Dedek v. Dedek

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 3, 2006No. 53A01-0512-CV-548PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Because of Michael Dedek's ("Father") disability, his children received a lump sum payment of retroactive Social Security disability benefits as well as monthly benefits going forward. Father sought to have this lump sum payment credited against his rather substantial child support arrearage, and the trial court refused to do so. In light of the Indiana Supreme Court's recent opinion in Brown v. Brown, we hold that Father is entitled to a credit against his arrearage, but only for the arrearage accumulated after he filed his petition to modify his child…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stultz v. StultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Nill v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Brown v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elwood v. ParkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Hieston v. State, Indiana Family & Social Services Administration Child Support BureauIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API