Legal Opinion

State v. Little

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 26, 1974No. 54PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant in his brief brings forward three assignments of error numbered first, sixth, and ninth. All assignments of error and exceptions not discussed in the brief are deemed to be abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 783 (G.S. 4A, Appendix 1(1)) ; State v. Crews, 284 N.C. 427, 201 S.E. 2d 840 (1974) ; State v. Kirby, 276 N.C. 123, 171 S.E. 2d 416 (1970) ; State v. Gordon, 241 N.C. 356, 85 S.E. 2d 322 (1955).

The first assignment of error is as follows:

“1. The lower Court erred in admitting irrelevant testimony.

Exeptions Nos. 1(R p 10), 2 (R p…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. FairclothSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. LillyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API