Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Hardwick

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1890No. 6567PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Taylor. Tried below before Hon. T. H. Connor.

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Associate Justice.

—This suit was brought by appellant to set aside an execution sale of land on the grounds of irregularities and inadequacy of consideration. The defendant in execution, who was the owner of the land when it was sold, subsequently sold and conveyed it to appellant.

The court sustained exceptions to the petition on the ground that the interest of the defendant in execution was not assignable and that the plaintiff could not maintain a suit to set aside the execution sale as a purchaser from and the assignee of the defendant in execution.

In this we think there was error.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. G. H. & S. A. R. R. v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Stewart v. H. & T. C. R'y Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ditmore Land & Cattle Company v. HicksTexas Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API