By-Prod Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Armen-Berry Company, Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
This case raises questions of federal counterclaim practice, pendent jurisdiction, and civil liability (federal and state) for “bugging” telephone conversations. It is an offshoot of a federal antitrust suit brought by By-Prod Corporation against the ArmenBerry Company. Both firms are processors of animal glands for sale to pharmaceutical manufacturers. The antitrust suit (which has not yet gone to trial) alleges that Ar-men-Berry and others conspired to divide the market for buying animal glands from slaughterhouses, to depress the prices they pay for the glands, and to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Florsheim v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Sidney Clark and Julia Clark v. Universal Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Moore v. Telfon Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Patricia Hennessy v. Penril Datacomm Networks, Incorporated and Richard BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. DaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Thomas Bernstein v. Lind-Waldock & Company and Chicago Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- In Re DoubleClick Inc. Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- United States v. John McTiernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.