Legal Opinion

Riedel v. Human Relations Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

This case is before the Court on remand by order of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. The Supreme Court reversed this Court’s decision to reverse the order of the Berks County Court of Common Pleas affirming an order of the Human Relations Commission of the City of Reading (HRC). The HRC held that Appellant Augustus Riedel engaged in a “discriminatory housing practice” in violation of Section 155.07(£) of the City of Reading’s Human Relations Ordinance (Ordinance) by making repeated obscene, hostile and derogatory remarks to Millicent Ferrer and her two children. The issues…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kryeski v. Schott Glass Technologies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Riedel v. HUMAN REL. COM'N OF READINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Foley Bros., Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Commonwealth v. ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Stackhouse v. DeSitterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marshall v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Bockelman Trucking v. Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API