Legal Opinion
United States v. Gama-Bastidas
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1998No. 97-4098PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Defendant Mr. Jesus Roberto Gama-Bastidas entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B). Defendant reserved the right to appeal the district court’s…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. Robert MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. DelucaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Robert Schreiber, Michael Franks, Brent Gilpin, and Susan Scainetti, John BiancoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.