Legal Opinion
Hope v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 15, 1993No. 9226SC206PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Petitioner contends that she was denied due process in the hearing before the Board. This claim is based on the roles played by attorneys for the Board and for the superintendent. The superintendent presented the case against petitioner to the Board, and the Board was the final decision maker on whether or not to dismiss petitioner. The lawyer representing the superintendent and the lawyer advising the Board worked in the same law firm. Petitioner argues that her right to due process was violated because the lawyer who presented the case against her was a member of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Thompson v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Marcus Holley v. The Seminole County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Crump v. BD. OF ED. OF HICKORY AD. SUSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Baxter v. PoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dorsey v. UNC-WILMINGTONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Avant v. Sandhills Center for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Jordan v. Civil Service Board of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Farris v. Burke County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Herron v. N.C. Bd. of Examiners for Eng'rs & SurveyorsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.