Commonwealth v. Zimmerman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
On January 11, 1967, Dr. Lamar T. Zimmerman was convicted on a charge of performing an illegal abortion. This is an appeal from the refusal of the trial court to grant defendant’s motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment. The only issue raised is whether sufficient evidence was presented to sustain the guilty verdict.
It is the duty of the court, in considering a motion for new trial and in arrest of judgment, to evaluate the sufficiency of the evidence by reviewing the entire trial record. The evidence must be read in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TabbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. BausewineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Commonwealth v. ClintonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ShapiroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. NavarroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. CraftSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. BondiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.