Legal Opinion
Schnakenberg
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 20, 1979No. 200-78PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In this civilian pay case, plaintiff William Schnakenberg was employed by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) until his removal for misconduct in March 1977. On appeal to the Federal Employee Appeals Authority (FEAA), three charges (two involving unauthorized use of a Government vehicle; one involving forcing another person to commit sodomy) were sustained. Because plaintiffs removal was neither an abuse of discretion, arbitrary, capricious, nor unsupported by substantial evidence, we uphold his removal.
Schnakenberg served with the New York Regional Office of the DEA. While on an assigned…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Wathen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Charles H. Young v. Robert E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Boyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Loyce E. Hayes v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Michael J. Brown v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Sandra P. Depte v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- GreenUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- StrothersUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.