Legal Opinion

People v. Holmes

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 20, 2010No. 2-08-0314PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

Defendant, Brandon R. Holmes, appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver more than one gram but less than five grams of a substance containing cocaine (720 ILCS 570/401(c)(2) (West 2006)). On appeal, he argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because defense counsel failed to: (1) move to dismiss the indictment; and (2) properly object to the State’s use of dog-tracking evidence. We affirm.

I. Facts

We will relate only the evidence necessary for the purposes of this appeal.

During the jury trial, Waukegan police officer Andrew Valko…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. People v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. CruzIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. LacyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. People v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. People v. SangsterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. People v. SandiferAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. People v. MontanoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API