Legal Opinion

Sipal Realty Corp. v. William

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 25, 1959Published

1Per curiam

The court below based its decision on a finding that rent was due in accordance with a judgment rendered in Special Term, Supreme Court. Thereafter, the Appellate Division reversed the Special Term. (Matter of Sipal Realty Corp. [Dankers], 16 Misc 2d 827, revd. 8 A D 2d 355.) While the preferable practice would have been to move in the Municipal Court for a new trial (Parkhurst v. Berdell, 110 N. Y. 386) we see no reason why the procedure should not be expedited. We, therefore, reverse the final order and direct a final order in favor of the tenant, without costs.

Concur — Steuer, J. P.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. In re Sipal Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API