Legal Opinion

Ainley v. American Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 20, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

'Appeal from Polk District Court. — IIon. W. F. Conrad, Judge. Action on a promissory note. Tbe defendant appeals from judgment on a directed verdict.

1Opinion of the Court

Ladd, I.

1 *7112 *710The evidence shows conclusively that on the twentieth day of April, 1897, the defendant was indebted to the Merchants’ & Bankers’ Insurance Company, or Theodore F. Getchell, or both, in the sum of $6,000. This was for money advanced for the organization of the defendant company, and premiums on reinsurance. Getchell insists he had no personal interest in the debt, and took the note in suit for the benefit of the Merchants’ & Bankers’ Insurance Company, and afterwards assigned it to plaintiff, as its secretary. On the other hand, the defendant asserts that the note was executed for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allen v. SeawardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  2. Bosley v. ParleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Snell v. Dubuque & Sioux City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. Noland v. LockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  5. Sweney v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moore v. CrandallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Kansas City Star Publishing Co. v. Standard Warehouse Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Guinn v. Iowa & St. Louis R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Bates v. NicholsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  5. Branson v. BransonNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API