Legal Opinion

CliniComp International, Inc. v. Cerner Corporation

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 3, 2023No. 3:17-cv-02479Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLINICOMP INTERNATIONAL, INC., Case No.: 17-cv-02479-GPC (DEB) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO

35 U.S.C. § 285

14 CERNER CORPORATION, 15 Defendant. [Dkt. No. 124.] 16 17 On November 30, 2022, Defendant Cerner Corporation (“Cerner”) filed a motion 18 for attorney’s fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285. (Dkt. No. 124.) On December 16, 2022, 19 Plaintiff CliniComp International, Inc. (“CliniComp”) filed a response in opposition to 20 Cerner’s motion for attorney’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
Surprenant v. RivasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.