Lusk v. Ramsay
Supreme Court of Virginia
WILLIAM RAMS AT filed his bill in the superior Court of chancery, for the Staunton district, stating that the goods of a certain David Lusk, of Rockbridge county, being under execution at the suit or Jones ts Co., (which property was principally store goods, or the remains of a store,) the complainant, and a certain Robert Moore, at the request of said Lusk, became his securities in a forthcoming bond for the delivery of said goods, on the day and at the place oí sale; the…
Read the full summary
WILLIAM RAMS AT filed his bill in the superior Court of chancery, for the Staunton district, stating that the goods of a certain David Lusk, of Rockbridge county, being under execution at the suit or Jones ts Co., (which property was principally store goods, or the remains of a store,) the complainant, and a certain Robert Moore, at the request of said Lusk, became his securities in a forthcoming bond for the delivery of said goods, on the day and at the place oí sale; the complainant having explained to the said Lusk, in the hearing of Troy man Waytt, deputy sheriff for James Caruthers, the…
1Opinion of the Court
the judges pronounced their opinions.
Judge Cabell.
Jones Co., having obtained a judgment against David Lusk, issued a fieri facias against his goods and chattels, which execution was put into the hands of Troyman Wa’ytt, a deputy sheriff for the county *429»{ Rockbridge, and was levied on certain goods, which were restored to Lusk, on his giving a forthcoming bond, in the usual form, and with tfte usual condition. A very short time before the day of sale, another execution, a ca. sa., in favour of Boys M^Calmoni, against the said Lusk, was put into the hands of the same deputy sheriff, Troyman…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eckhols v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1799