Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Cummings
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1960No. 9149PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AYRES, Judge.
This is an action on a promissory note in connection with which certain property of the defendant was attached. Release of the property was subsequently obtained by defendant on a bond executed by Sam J. DeFatta as surety. In a supplemental petition, it was alleged that the property bonded had been disposed of and that de*607fendant was unable to produce the same. Accordingly, DeFatta was joined as a party defendant and judgment was sought against him. In the amended petition, it was alleged
“That since the filing of the original petition herein, the said C. C. Cummings filed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Payne v. AbleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870
- A. Klipstein & Co. v. Allen-Miles Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905
- Crook Horner Co. v. GilpinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Serra é Hijo v. Hoffman & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
- Stull Bros. v. BeddeoNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In the Matter of General Steel Tank Company, Inc., Bankrupt. Merritt-Holland Welding Suplies, Inc. v. General Steel Tank Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Morgan v. CummingsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960