Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Rainier National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1988No. 54477-8PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brachtenbach, J. —

Debtors on a promissory note defaulted and the lender accelerated the maturity date pursuant to a default-acceleration provision. As a requirement for the debtor to avoid foreclosure sale, the lender demanded unaccrued interest for the period during which prepayment was prohibited, and also demanded a prepayment penalty which would have been due had prepayment occurred subsequent to that prohibition period. The question presented is whether the debtors can recover the unac-crued interest and the prepayment penalty which they paid under protest. The trial court answered in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Lhd Realty Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. UrestiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Slevin Container Corp. v. Provident Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. George H. Nutman, Inc. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1982
  5. McCausland v. Bankers Life Insurance Co. of NebraskaWashington Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Uniondale Realty AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sandra M. Merceri v. The Bank Of New York MellonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. Delaware Trust Co. v. Energy Future Intermediate Holding Co. (In re Energy Future Holdings Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2015
  4. FLORIDA NAT. BANK OF MIAMI v. BankatlanticSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. FLORIDA NAT. BANK v. BankatlanticDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API