Legal Opinion

Brock v. Clary

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 5, 2025No. 2:22-cv-10500Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BRADLEY BROCK, Case No. 22-10500 Plaintiff, Honorable Jonathan J.C. Grey v. MONTREAL CLARY, Defendant. ______________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR REMITTITUR AND DENYING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT (ECF No. 88) This matter is before the Court on Defendant Montreal Clary’s motions for remittitur and/or judgment notwithstanding the verdict (ECF No. 88). Plaintiff Bradley Brock filed a response to the motion for remittitur and no reply was filed. (ECF…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API