Legal Opinion

Waybright v. Meek

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1928No. Docket No. 6272PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Action to recover a broker’s commission of $5,000 for securing a loan of $50,000. The complaint is in three counts. The first cause of action alleges an agreement to pay plaintiff and Elmer E. Cole $5,000 to negotiate the loan. The second alleges that plaintiff performed services as -broker for defendants to the reasonable value of $5,000. The third, that, plaintiff performed services as broker for defendants and that they agreed to pay for said services the sum of $5,000. Prior to the filing of the action, Cole assigned his interest in the claim to plaintiff. Issues were joined on an answer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Pacific Wharf & Storage Co. v. Standard American Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Forte v. NolfiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Piedmont Life Insurance Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Brown v. FreeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Shaw Supply Co., Inc. v. MorganIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API