Hill v. Hill
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
On appeal from a decree of the Mercer county orphans court.
1Opinion of the Court
Pitney,
Ordinary.
In an accounting before the orphans court by Edmund C. Hill and Charles W. Howell, trustees under the will of Thomas C. Hill, deceased, they charged themselves with the sum of $53,625, received from S. P. Dunham & Company as proceeds of the sale of a parcel of real estate known as No. 11 North Broad street, in the city of Trenton (the nominal price being $55,000, with a discount of two and one-half per cent, for cash payment), and they prayed allowance for $1,375 paid to Messrs. Case & Cain, real estate agents, for commissions on this sale.
To this account three exceptions were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hubbell v. HubbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Manning v. ManningNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
- Mason v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Baker v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Cheever v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re FulperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1926
- Lewis v. IngramCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Burke v. GuntherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
- Taylor v. ErrionNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
- In Re CarusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.