Legal Opinion

Sabin v. Rauch

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1953No. 5706PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINDES, Justice.

Suit by vendor, plaintiff below, to require vendee, defendant below, to specifically perform her contract of purchase. We held that if defendant were required to completely perform there would be a reasonable doubt that she would receive marketable title because of certain joint tenancy deeds issued to third parties by former vendors of the property. Sabin v. Rauch, 75 Ariz. 275, 255 P.2d 206. The facts are found in the original opinion. On motion for rehearing, amici curiae were granted leave to appear and file a brief. In the light of the points raised therein, we decided to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sabin v. RauchArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. New York Investors, Inc. v. Manhattan Beach Bathing Parks Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Sherman v. BeamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Huwe v. MourtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sam Levitz Furniture Co. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Schneider v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  3. Turley v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Sam Levitz Furniture Co. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API