DiCarlo v. McCarthy

Petitioner obtained a civil stalking protective order (SPO) against respondent. Respondent appeals, arguing that petitioner failed to establish facts sufficient to support the issuance of an SPO. We affirm.

We review the facts de novo. Hanzo v. deParrie, 152 Or App 525, 537, 953 P2d 1130 (1998). On April 15, 2005, petitioner drove to the grocery store in her boyfriend’s truck. After shopping, respondent accosted her as she was returning to the truck. Respondent, a former coworker of petitioner’s boyfriend, recognized the truck. Apparently, respondent’s employer had lent petitioner’s boyfriend…