Legal Opinion
Potocni v. Asco Mining Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 1, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 60-215PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE S. GOURLEY, Chief Judge.
In this diversity action stemming from a motor vehicle collision, defendant has filed motion to dismiss the complaint for the reason that the principal place of business of defendant, Asco Mining Company, Inc., within the meaning of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332, as amended effective July 25, 1958, is within the State of Pennsylvania. The plaintiff is a citizen of Pennsylvania.
It is not in dispute that defendant was incorporated under the laws of the State of New York in 1958, for the purpose of mining and marketing coal in Pennsylvania; that since its…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Kelly v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Blair Riggs v. Island Creek Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Leve v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Nerco Delamar Co. v. North American Silver Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1989
- Jack R. Kelly v. United States Steel Corporation and the Thew Shovel Company, a Corporation, Homer L. Johnston v. United States Steel Corporation and the Thew Shovel Company, a Corporation. Rose Marie Egan, and George W. Egan and Teresa Egan, Her Parents v. United States Steel Corporation. Andrew J. Turner, Sr. v. United States Steel Corporation. Mary McKissock v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.