Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Murray

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 19, 1994No. 94SA161Published

1DissentJustice Scott

The majority accepted the recommendation of a divided hearing board that the respondent, Mack Edward Murray, be disbarred and ordered to pay costs.4 Although I would agree with the majority that there were egregious violations requiring discipline and I agree “that in the absence of mitigating circumstances, disbarment is generally warranted,” maj. op. at 1021, I do not agree with the majority’s imposition of the sanction of disbarment on the ground that it is unwarranted and hence, too severe a sanction given the existence of several mitigating factors. Therefore, I respectfully dissent as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. AbelmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. DulaneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. People v. MulliganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. People v. SouthernSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. DixonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API