Legal Opinion
Ill v. Roland
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 10, 1993No. 92 C 6734PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For reasons that follow the court grants the motion but grants the plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint in accordance with this opinion.
FACTS
On March 27, 1988, at about 5:30 a.m., defendants William Roland and Mark Ross-Corbett, two officers of the City of Zion’s police force, entered the home of plaintiffs Lazio Ill and Valerie III and there arrested Lazio, Valerie, and Miklas Ill (collectively referred to as “plaintiffs”). In this action…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- James L. Beck v. Caterpillar Inc. And United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Brandon v. Village of MaywoodDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Vakharia v. Little Co. of Mary Hospital & Health Care CentersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Matlock v. HawkesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Milchtein v. Milwaukee CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020