Legal Opinion

Arnold Ex Rel. Hill v. Hartford Life Insurance

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided December 27, 2007No. Civil Action 7:07CV00093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GLEN E. CONRAD, District Judge.

This matter involves a claim, under the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”), for mandatory and voluntary benefits under the Accidental Death & Dismemberment Policy (“the Policy”) issued by the defendant, Hartford Life Insurance Co. (“Hartford”), to Volvo Trucks North America, Inc. (“Volvo”), the employer of the plaintiffs deceased father. The case is before the court on plaintiffs motion for full and fair de novo hearing on the merits or opening of administrative record. For the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hebra A. Berry v. Ciba-Geigy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  2. Ellen v. Ellis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  3. Bernstein v. CapitalCare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. Gable v. Sweetheart Cup Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  5. Sally J. Burke v. Kodak Retirement Income Plan and Kodak Retirement Income Plan CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chavis v. Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 486 Pension PlanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  2. Chavis v. Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 486 Pension PlanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  3. Grant v. Sprint Nextel Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API