Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 1, 2016No. CR-16-87PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhonda K. Wood, Associate Justice

11 Todd Aaron Smith appeals the circuit court’s denial of his petition for postconviction relief. Smith was convicted for the rape of a young girl. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective in three respects: (1) for failing to object to multiple instances of inadmissible hearsay and uncharged allegations of sexual abuse; (2) for failing to object and seek a mistrial when one of the jurors allegedly fell asleep during trial; and (3) for failing to call into question the credibility of the alleged victims and to highlight inconsistencies in their stories. We affirm the circuit court’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Gaines v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Flanery v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Robert Holland v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2022
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  3. Bryan Porras v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
  4. Dean Leroy Meacham v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2025
  5. Dean Leroy Meacham v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API